Tag Archives: Speculatons

Examining Shocks Through the Lens of Fetches

Modern Masters 2015 is still all the rage in the #mtgfinance community (you can read my initial thoughts here), but we still know very little about the set, too little to make many solid evaluations. Probably the most important thing we do know is that nothing past New Phyrexia will be printed in the set. A quick look back at the original MMA reminds us that the cut-off the first time around was Zendikar block, at this time of year in 2012 was fairly recently rotated from standard.

1. This means that, at least as far as seasonal and rotational cycles, Zendikar block is to MMA what Return to Ravnica block is to MM2015.

It’s common knowledge that the best time to buy new Modern (or Legacy) cards is within a few months of their rotation from standard. I won’t bother rehashing the reasons why, because they are fairly well known and understood.

This means that, even without the MM2015 announcement, it is already the right time to be buying eternal playables from RTR block. If anything, we are getting close to the end of the window, as most tournament cards bottom somewhere between rotation and the release of the winter set.

While there are quite a few eternal cards in Return to Ravnica block, today we are going to focus exclusively on the Shock lands, with the help of the price trajectories of the Fetch lands during the year after Zendikar’s rotation from standard.

ImageImage

2. While ZEN is to MMA what RTR is to MM2015, there is more RTR in print.

If you look back over the price histories of Zendikar block, you’ll find that most Modern playables (including the Fetchland cycle) bottomed between rotation and the release of Mirrodin Besiged, started slowing creeping up through the Spring of 2013, and then doubled in price from when MMA released and November 2013 (and then many of these cards spiked even higher around the time of GP Richmond.)

This said, being the “most opened set in history” limits the potential of RTR block when compared to Zendikar. WOTC is notorious for not releasing print runs, so its hard to say just how many more Shocks there are than Fetches, or how many more Sphinx’s Revelations there are than Iona’s, but rest assured, there are more, and likely magnitudes more.

Shocks in particular present a problem. While all the Zendikar fetches more then doubled in price between October 2012 and October 2013, not only did they have the Modern explosion from MMA, but also Legacy demand, as well as the benefits of only having a single printing in an early-growth period set. Shocks, on the other hand, have 2.5 printings (counting the Dragon’s Maze copies of the RTR and GTC shocks as a half a printing), have little Legacy demand, and are found in middle-to-late growth period set. They are also less-played in Modern than fetches, generally being one-or-two ofs, rather than four-ofs.

As such, when you look at the big pictures, it seems hard to argue that shocks can experience the same amount of growth as fetches did post-rotation. This said, it also seems very likely that shocks are still a great buy at the moment.

3. So where are Shocks going to be in a year?

Zendikar fetches increased, on average 170 percent in their year following their rotation. Scalding Tarn went from $18 to $50, even the lowly Marsh Flats went from $12 to $32. If we translated a 170 percent increase into Shock values, we would be looking at prices in the low-to-mid $20’s next fall.

But again, Shocks are not fetches.

So what if we assume, based on all the factors we talked about a few moments ago (DGM printing, original Ravnica block printing, coming from a more opened set, seeing less play in both modern and legacy) Shocks increase at half the rate of Fetches. This would give us an increase of 85 percent rather than 170 percent. Based on the current $8-$10 price range on shocks, this would mean a year from now, prices would be in the mid-to-high teens. Which definitely seems worth buying into.

The less profitable alternative is if, instead of growing at half the rate of Fetches, Shocks only grow at a quarter of the rate, and increase 42 percent. This would give us prices between $12 and $14. While this still represents a profit, if you think about opportunity cost, shipping, and fees, buying in at $9 and selling for $13 is by no means a slam dunk (and also eliminates buylists as an option for moving your Shocks, because with a typical 30 percent spread, you would be making in the neighborhood of $0.10 a piece for a not-insignificant investment).

4. So the question is, do you believe Shocks are half as good as Fetches?

Personally, I believe they are, and as a result, I’m expecting mid-to-high teen prices for Shocks by next fall, but this is a question you need to ask and answer for yourself, based on the evidence and your feelings about the potential growth in the Modern format as a result of MM2015. If you don’t feel confidant that Shock can and will grow at half the rate of Fetches (or more), than you shouldn’t buy in.

P.S. If you decide to buy in, BUY THE ORIGINALS.

Now, take this with a grain of stale, because I’m a sucker for original printing personally, but I’m only interested in buying Shocks from the original Ravnica block. Apart from my bias against reprints, the general consensus seems to be that the art is better, and from a pragmatic standpoint, there are far fewer in circulation.

Plus, they only cost a dollar or two more than the RTR versions, which seems crazy.

You can buy a KTK Polluted Delta for about $15, but if you want an ONS copy, it’s going to cost you closer to $50 (I realize KTK to ONS is more different than RAV to RTR ascetically, but still). At the same time, you can buy a Gatecrash Breeding Pool for $9 ,but you can get the much better looking and rarer Dissension version for $10? This doesn’t really make much sense. Why would you not be the originals when the prices are practically the same?

Anyway, that’s all for today. I have a piece ready to go at http://www.mtggoldfish.com comparing holding sealed booster boxes to investing in mutual funds. It should be out soon, so make sure to check it out.

More on Prophetic Flamespeaker

My post here yesterday regarding my belief that Prophetic Flamespeaker is a good buy certainly stirred up the community and produced some good conversation, so over all I would consider it a success, but I can’t help but feeling like I could have explained myself better, which is what I want to do now.

Prophetic Flamespeaker

1. The Grand Prix San Antonio Trial deck list is what brought Prophetic Flamespeaker to my attention, but it is not the reason I feel the card is a good investment. In all reality, after spending its first 9 months in standard seeing minimal play, the odds that Flamespeaker becomes an x4 staple is minimal, 10 or 15 percent, and maybe less.

2. Flamespeaker doesn’t need to be an x4 staple to increase in price in the longer term. I went back and looked over the current prices of spring set mythics over the entire history of the mythic rarity. Discounting standard legal sets and the recently rotated Dragon’s Maze, there are 50 spring set mythics from Alara Reborn through Avacyn Restored. 38 of these cards are currently worth four dollars or more.

Of the 12 cards (20 percent of spring set mythics) worth less than $4, two have been reprinted in Commander decks, six are from the not-that-old Avacyn Restored, and four are just underpowered (think: Cast Through Time).

If you narrow the search to small spring set mythics, you have a total of 20 cards from Alara Reborn and New Phyrexia. Of these twenty, 18 have a single printing, and only two of these 18 are worth less than $4 (Defiler of Souls and Etched Monstrosity).

Admittedly, I don’t know exact print runs, so the fact that such a low number of mythics from spring sets stay at Prophetic Flamespeaker price levels over the long-term is not necessarily predictive for the Human Shaman. Maybe there is far more JOU in print than NPH, despite the fact that NPH was powerful and rather liked (from what I remember) and JOU is underpowered and disliked. But all in all it seems likely that, without a reprinting, Flamespeaker will be at least $4 in two or three years.

3. A good number of the mythics from spring sets that are now $6-$12 dollars were $2-$3 during their standard life, so it’s not simply that these past mythics with higher price tags are more powerful or inherently more valuable than Flamespeaker.

4. I mentioned the negative spread on Prophetic Flamespeaker. I was not trying to suggest you should look to make a profit by buying from one vendor for $1.69 and selling to another at $2.01, at $0.30 cent per copy, its not really worth the work. But the spread has more value than arbitrage opportunities.

The average spread on standard mythics is somewhere in the in the neighborhood of 35 percent. Just like the EV of an in-print booster box cannot maintain a price that is higher than the cost of the box, a card cannot maintain a negative spread. Vendors will adjust their pricing, and over the long term the spread will trend back towards the average. All this to say, the negative spread suggests that Flamespeaker is due for a price adjustment.

5. I always try to be aware of the opportunity costs of my speculations. This is the main reason why I didn’t “go deep” on 50 or 100 copies of Flamespeaker. I believe the odds are strongly in favor of Flamespeaker increasing in price eventually, and being $4+ in three years, but I also value having my hypothetical “100 copies of Flamespeaker” cash to use on other speculations during the next 36 months.

For me, buying two or three sets is the sweet spot for Flamespeaker. If I hits the 10 percenter, and Flamespeaker becomes a standard staple, I going be be very glad I bought in. Over the long term, its hard for me to imagine a unique, powerful, and (fringe) eternal playable mythic from an under-opened set being $2, so I’m happy to have some number of copies on hand, without incurring too much of an opportunity cost. And if I’m total wrong? I get out of them for $1 and lose $0.50 per copy. Very little risk, if opportunity costs are controlled.

6. Some people took issue with my calling Prophetic Flamespeaker “modern playable” or “eternal playable.” To me, playable isn’t a subjective statement, it’s an objective analysis of deck lists. Since Flamespeaker was an x4 in an deck that won a event, and showed up in various quantities in a handful of other decks in other tournaments, its playable in my book.

I’m not suggesting its the next Tarmogoyf, but Flamespeaker is of a power level that makes it modern playable. I know this because people its been played.

7. I mentioned this in the forums. Don’t buy a card because I (or any other financier) buys it, or tells you to. Use my evidence and thoughts as a jumping off point to form your own opinions and learn to the data and tools available to see why a card is, or is not, a good purchase. My goal is to share well-evidenced and statistically based opinions. Your job is to think for yourself.

Anyways, I hope this makes a bit more sense.

That’s all for tonight. I’m going to hit up a VMA 8-4 before heading to bed, I should have the second part of the Cognitive Bias in MTG Finance piece on www.mtggoldfish.com in the next day or two, it’s written, I’m just softening the rough edges.

 

Prophetic Mardu Takes Down GPT

Sideboard (15)

2 Crackling Doom

Comments:
Prophetic Flamespeaker is from the right set JOU (small, spring) to see big gains with x4 play. After no small amount of hype at release, Flamespeaker has mostly been relegated to x1 status in tier 2 mono-red aggro decks, and even in these decks, he is no sure conclusion. Perhaps this is changing with the success (albeit in a trial) of the above list.

Flamespeaker is currently at an all time low. You can buy from vendors for as low as $1.79. He also boasts a negative spread, with the best buylist price being $2.01.

Persuaded by the fact that Flamespeaker, at various times, has seen fringe modern play, and has potential to show up in the format again, sooner or later, I just picked up two play sets, even if the Prophetic Mardu deck goes no where, all the other signs point to Flamespeaker being a solid buy at the moment.